Crime+scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4708179"

My name is Detective Danford. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene a 2 bed, 1 bathroom beachouse. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad. He didn't have many friends or any family. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Felix. (What was his motive?) He is guilty because he had no friends and no family .He framed his friends and while on the way to the morgue he escaped.This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. test performed was the secret note test. I believe that he forged the not to frame his friends. The results of the test were Vera wrote it, but felix may have forged it (faked it). (The handwriting test proved Kendra wrote it...Felix had nothing to do with this forging.)

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the DNA in the comb.It proved that felix used the comb and may have made the fake blood all along (How is the comb linked to the fake blood?). The evidence was found in the comb. The test performed was DNA test. The results of the test were Felixs hair was in the comb.This connects the suspect to the crime because felix may have used the comb before the supposed time of death.

The next piece of evidence collected was the ice cube test. It was found near the body.This evidence was important becuase normal water is 7 which is a base and the ice water was a 10 which was an acid (The tests show it was a base). Someone tampered with the ice water.

Another piece of evidence was that there was no body.That is important because it supports my theory and also people have said they've seen him elsewhere.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. There was an ongoing house warmig party at the alleged time of felixs death. At the exact time of his death felix and alfredo were in a room and were drinking cola together.as Alfredo went to the bathroom Felix supposedly died.When he came back he found felixs body lying on the ground.He called everyone else and they called the cops. (How was he able to fool the police?)

Therefore, Felix committed the crime of faking death and framing others.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 72% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || __**The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.**__  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __**Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.**__  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || __** The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. **__ || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __ **Conclusion summarizes information.**  __ || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation__**.  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 41/57